Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

14
PROTECTIVE HOMOEOPATHY
protectivehomoeopathy.blogspot.com
14
AVA AUGUST
avaaugust.com
14
AUSTINE NORTH | OFFICIAL WEBSITE
austinenorth.art
14
ZEBIQ TECHNOLOGY - ZEBIQ TECHNOLOGY
zebiqtechnology.com
14
BEATS & SMILES
midlandsdj.com
14
BOT VERIFICATION
uniqueradio.org

Latest Sites

2
YOUTUBE
youtu.be
9
YOUTUBE
youtube.com
11
MAXIELIT KOSTTILLSKOTT OCH HÄLSOKOST - FRI FRAKT ÖVER 500KR
maxielit.se
19
THE PREMIUM MILITARY GEAR COMPANY IN --- - OLIVE PLANET
oliveplanet.in
14
ELGOOD – THE ELGOOD WAY
elgood.fi

Top Technologies

Google Font API
Font Scripts
Nginx
Web Servers
CloudFlare
CDN
Varnish
Cache Tools
Google Tag Manager
Tag Managers
Font Awesome
Font Scripts
Twitter Bootstrap
Web Frameworks
WordPress
CMS

14 elgood.fi Last Updated: 17 hours

Success 62% of passed verification steps
Warning 15% of total warning
Errors 23% of total errors, require fast action

Desktop

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 91%
Best Practices Desktop Score 96%
SEO Desktop Score 100%
Performance Mobile Score 46%
Best Practices Mobile Score 93%
SEO Mobile Score 100%
Page Authority Authority 0%
Domain Authority Domain Authority 0%
Moz Rank 0.0/10
Bounce Rate Rate 0%
Title Tag 23 Characters
ELGOOD – THE ELGOOD WAY
Meta Description 350 Characters
Elektroniikan osaaja Elgood Oy on toiminut johtavien elektroniikkavalmistajien edustajana vuodesta 1997. Olemme erikoistuneet elektronisten laitteiden asiakaskohtaisten ja kustannustehokkaiden ratkaisujen toimittamiseen yhteistyössä kumppanivalmistajiemme kanssa. Elgood-tiimissä on jokaiselle osa-alueelle oma tekninen asiantuntija suunnittelijoid
Effective URL 21 Characters
https://www.elgood.fi
Excerpt Page content
Elgood – The Elgood Way Skip to content Toggle NavigationEtusivuTuotteetAnnostelu ja kemikaalitAnnosteluUV-lamput ja...
Keywords Cloud Density
elgood11 lisää10 evästeet6 kestävä4 evästeitä3 johtavien3 kehitys3 palvelut3 vuodesta3 toiminut3
Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO
Keyword Freq Title Desc Domain H1 H2
elgood 11
lisää 10
evästeet 6
kestävä 4
evästeitä 3
johtavien 3
kehitys 3
palvelut 3
vuodesta 3
toiminut 3
Google Preview Your look like this in google search result
ELGOOD – THE ELGOOD WAY
https://www.elgood.fi
Elektroniikan osaaja Elgood Oy on toiminut johtavien elektroniikkavalmistajien edustajana vuodesta 1997. Olemme erikoistuneet elektronisten laitteid
Robots.txt File Detected
Sitemap.xml File Detected
Page Size Code & Text Ratio
Document Size: ~123.01 KB
Code Size: ~111.85 KB
Text Size: ~11.17 KB Ratio: 9.08%

Social Data

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

8
Unique Visits
Daily
14
Pages Views
Daily
$0
Income
Daily
224
Unique Visits
Monthly
399
Pages Views
Monthly
$0
Income
Monthly
2,592
Unique Visits
Yearly
4,704
Pages Views
Yearly
$0
Income
Yearly

Desktop

Desktop Screenshot
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 3 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Avoid enormous network payloads Total size was 15,575 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times
Network Round Trip Times 10 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance
Largest Contentful Paint element 1,360 ms
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport
Improve image delivery Est savings of 194 KiB
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP
Avoid chaining critical requests 9 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task
Minimizes main-thread work 1.5 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,177 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)
Avoid long main-thread tasks 3 long tasks found
Lists the longest tasks on the main thread, useful for identifying worst contributors to input delay
Serve images in next-gen formats Est savings of 544 KiB
Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption
Eliminate render-blocking resources Est savings of 490 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles
Avoid large layout shifts 1 layout shift found
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls)
Use efficient cache lifetimes Est savings of 3 KiB
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Efficiently encode images Est savings of 4 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data
Reduce unused JavaScript Est savings of 237 KiB
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity
Total Blocking Time 20 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds
Initial server response time was short Root document took 130 ms
Keep the server response time for the main document short because all other requests depend on it
JavaScript execution time 0.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 20 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading
Reduce unused CSS Est savings of 136 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity
Time to Interactive 2.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive
Server Backend Latencies 130 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance
Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers Est savings of 9 KiB
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/baseline) features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers
Legacy JavaScript Est savings of 32 KiB
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/articles/baseline-and-polyfills) features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers
Speed Index 2.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Mobile

Mobile Screenshot
Reduce JavaScript execution time 1.5 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Max Potential First Input Delay 200 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task
Avoid large layout shifts 3 layout shifts found
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls)
Speed Index 7.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated
Eliminate render-blocking resources Est savings of 2,910 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles
Server Backend Latencies 170 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance
Largest Contentful Paint element 13,210 ms
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport
Total Blocking Time 450 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds
Cumulative Layout Shift 0.087
Cumulative Layout Shift measures the movement of visible elements within the viewport
Time to Interactive 14.5 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive
Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers Est savings of 9 KiB
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/baseline) features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers
Use efficient cache lifetimes Est savings of 3 KiB
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Efficiently encode images Est savings of 4 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data
Minimize main-thread work 3.7 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,175 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)
Avoid long main-thread tasks 12 long tasks found
Lists the longest tasks on the main thread, useful for identifying worst contributors to input delay
Avoid enormous network payloads Total size was 27,263 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times
Reduce unused JavaScript Est savings of 236 KiB
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity
Largest Contentful Paint 13.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted
Improve image delivery Est savings of 18 KiB
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP
First Contentful Paint 4.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted
Initial server response time was short Root document took 130 ms
Keep the server response time for the main document short because all other requests depend on it
Serve images in next-gen formats Est savings of 428 KiB
Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption
Legacy JavaScript Est savings of 32 KiB
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile [Baseline](https://web.dev/articles/baseline-and-polyfills) features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers
Avoid chaining critical requests 8 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load
Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 460 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading
Avoid non-composited animations 3 animated elements found
Animations which are not composited can be janky and increase CLS
Reduce unused CSS Est savings of 133 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity
Document uses legible font sizes 99.16% legible text
Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px
Network Round Trip Times 40 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 3 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Speed And Optimization Tips

Website speed has a huge impact on performance, affecting user experience, conversion rates and even rankings. ‪‬‬By reducing page load-times, users are less likely to get distracted and the search engines are more likely to reward you by ranking you
Title Website
Congratulations! Your title is optimized
Description Website
Warning! Your description is not optimized
Robots.txt
Congratulations! Your site have a robots.txt file
Sitemap.xml
Congratulations! We've found a sitemap file for your website
SSL Secure
Congratulations! Your site have Support to HTTPS
Headings
Congratulations! You are using your H1 and H2 tags in your site
Blacklist
Congratulations! Your site is not listed in a blacklist
W3C Validator
Warning! Your site have errors W3C
Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP)
Warning! Your site not have AMP Version
Domain Authority
Warning! Domain Authority of your website is slow. It is good to have domain authority more than 25.
GZIP Compress
Warning! Your site not is compressed, this can make slower response for the visitors
Favicon
Congratulations! Your website appears to have a favicon.
Broken Links
Congratulations! You not have broken links View links

Alexa Rank

99,999,999

Global Rank

99,999,999

-
Traffic
Search

Domain Available

Domain (TDL) and Typo Status
elgood.co Available
elgood.us Available
elgood.com Already Registered
elgood.org Available
elgood.net Already Registered
egood.fi Available
xlgood.fi Available
dlgood.fi Available

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: ; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
link: ; rel=shortlink
etag: "965-1749128330;;;"
x-litespeed-cache: hit
date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:03:33 GMT
server: LiteSpeed
vary: User-Agent
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-29=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q050=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q046=":443"; ma=2592000, h3-Q043=":443"; ma=2592000, quic=":443"; ma=2592000; v="43,46"
DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname
View DNS Records